Which sorting algorithm has the best asymptotic runtime complexity?

 

Introduction

Are you scratching your head in confusion because you do not know which sorting algorithm has the best asymptotic runtime complexity?  

Algorithm comparisons are based on asymptotic runtime complexity. Since absolute times are hardware-specific, comparing them is not particularly useful. Deeper, hardware-independent mathematical truths about algorithms are revealed by asymptotic runtime complexity.

In this post, we will explore the problem of sorting a list of n numbers using an asymptotic time complexity of O(n log n).

Which sorting algorithm has the best asymptotic runtime complexity?

The best asymptotic time and space complexity of sorting is O(n log n), which means that for any given instance of the problem, it will take less time than the problem has space to solve. 

This happens because the height of a heap is constant and so when we add more items to our heap, we make it harder for them all to fit on top of each other. 

The number of comparisons needed increases exponentially with increasing size (number of elements) in this way. However, if enough room exists then we can use quick-sort instead which takes constant time per operation (O(1)).

In addition to these two algorithms both having similar runtime complexities there are also many others with similar performance characteristics such as insertion sort and merge sort

Insertion Sort

The straightforward sorting algorithm known as insertion sort builds the sorted list one element at a time. It is a stable sort, which means that the input order of elements with equal values is maintained. 

We begin by assuming that a list with one element is already sorted in order to sort an array using the Insertion Sort algorithm. The current element is compared to the pre-sorted sublist on each pass, one for each of the elements 1 through n-1.

We continue until everything has been done correctly and all elements are accounted for, at which point our final result will be exactly as if no other algorithms had been used at all. 

We do this by going back into the previously sorted sub list to determine where this new element should go and how many locations need to be filled in order for it to be inserted into their proper position(s).

The algorithm works by comparing each element with the next. If they are out of order, swap them. This is repeated until everything is in order. A simple example to illustrate this idea is below:

Heap Sort

= Heap sort is O(n log n) time, which means it’s about as fast as we can get for sorting.

= It works by repeatedly removing the maximum element from a partially sorted heap and inserting it into its proper location in the array.

= You can learn more about this algorithm on Wikipedia and Khan Academy, but here are some resources if you want to read up on it:

= The book Introduction to Algorithms describes how heapsort works in detail. There's also an implementation in Python that you can use if you want something practical right away! 

Heap sort is O(n log n) time

Heap sort is a type of time complexity of sorting algorithms that uses a heap data structure to perform the sort. Heaps are special kinds of trees where each node has at most two children and every leaf contains at most one child. 

A heap tree can be visualized as follows:

Advantages of using Heap sort algorithm

With a heap sort, the entire array is split into two sections: the sorted region and the unsorted region. It transfers the elements from the array's unsorted portion to the sorted portion one at a time.

The Heap sort algorithm is popular due to its effectiveness. The list of items to be sorted is converted into a binary tree with heap properties in a heap data structure as part of the heap sort process. Each node in a binary tree has a maximum of two descendants.

 When none of a node's descendants have values greater than the node itself, the node has the heap property. The heap's biggest component is taken out and added to the sorted list. 

The remaining sub-tree is once more reduced to a heap. Up until no elements are left, this process is repeated. The final sorted list of items is created by successively removing the root node following each rebuilding of the heap.

Consistency

Performance of the heap sort algorithm is reliable. This means that it performs admirably in all circumstances, regardless of how bad they are. It is especially suitable for use in systems with critical response times due to its guaranteed performance.

Efficiency

The Heap sort algorithm performs extremely well. Heap sort takes logarithmic time to complete, whereas other sorting algorithms may become exponentially slower as the number of items to sort rises. 

This suggests that sorting a lengthy list of items is a situation where Heap sort excels. Additionally, heap sort performs at its best. This suggests that no other sorting algorithm can outperform it.

Simplicity

Compared to other sorting algorithms that are just as effective, the Heap sort algorithm is easier to comprehend. It is also simpler for programmers to implement correctly since it does not use complex computer science ideas like recursion.

Use of Memory

A sorting algorithm that can be used in-place is the heap sort algorithm. This indicates that it uses little memory since it doesn't require any additional memory beyond what is required to store the initial list of items to be sorted. 

The Merge sort algorithm, in contrast, needs more memory. Similar to this, the recursive nature of the Quick sort algorithm necessitates more stack space.

With this, you can also learn about compile time polymorphism which can be obtained with the help of overloading. This process is executed during the compile time and forms an important part of the compiler. 

Read full article.